These are the scout units for heavy armor and infantry battalions. In the US Army the medium cavalry role is filled by helicopters today. Hopefully we will see the M8 AGS fielded and be able to have a medium cavalry ground component. Heavy cavalry is either the Cavalry Regiment, which as Abrams, Bradleys and helicopters, or the heavy armor battalion. Armor is afraid of Infantry and Cavalry things they're as good as the Infantry! Dirty Little Links: News Links.
Rules of Use. How to Behave on an Internet Forum. Armor Discussion Board. Return to Topic Page. Subject: Difference between Armour and Cavalry?
What is the difference between Armour and Cavalry? They do seem to be classified as different types of unit. Latest News. The Indian Wars - when cavalry fought to protect what was gained and expanded our horizons.
Mexico again - when the cavalry pursued Pancho Villa during the Punitive Expedition. In the Army Organization Act of armor was named one of the basic branches, and specified as a continuation of cavalry. Between Korea and Vietnam, a new doctrine came into being, air cavalry and attack helicopters came into their own.
New days, new doctrine. Armor advanced with the times. Combined Arms was the theme, with infantry, artillery, and aviation working together with the Combat Arm of Decision.
Operation Desert Storm - when this potent mix of force and doctrine overwhelmed Iraq. The heritage began in cavalry - it continues in armor. The spirit of the attack, armor shock and firepower, the will to fight, to close rapidly with the enemy - these are today and tomorrow the hallmarks of armor. At the time of the American Revolution, the term cavalry was applied to that branch of the military service whose members served and fought on horseback; the word horse was used about as often and meant essentially the same thing.
By the eighteenth century specialization had developed sufficiently in cavalry to bring forth three distinctive types of mounted commands, varying in mission, armament, and weight of horses: the heavy cavalry, used primarily for shock effect in battle; the light cavalry, designed for reconnaissance, screening missions, and messenger service; and the dragoons, trained to fight both on foot and on horse.
In actual practice, these distinctions were far from precise, and they tended to decrease in importance in the nineteenth century. In North America, the traditional cavalryman has ever been the light dragoon- a soldier trained and equipped to fight mounted or dismounted, to perform screening and reconnaissance, and to act as a scout or messenger. True heavy and true light horse have been rare.
At the outbreak of the Civil War, the military leaders of the day neither valued nor understood the potential of the horse regiments. Although the cavalrymen on the western Plains had learned through experience that the continuous, long-range fire of the new breechloading rifles had destroyed the effectiveness of the saber charge against infantry, generals in Washington clung to that precept for the employment of cavalry. They did not visualize the effective employment of cavalry in broken, wooded areas.
Believing that the war would be short, and noting the cost of arming, equipping, and training a mounted force, they agreed that the new improved firearms carried by the less expensive infantry rendered a more mobile force unnecessary. The Confederate leaders seemed from the beginning to appraise cavalry and its functions at their true value. Finally, keep seeking sources on the same or related subject until you have met your objective. The key to a success lies in developing a thread of study to pursue.
Use your fellow soldiers as sounding boards for ideas you develop and to help you refine your study over time. There is no penalty for experiencing difficulty while honestly pursuing your self study program, but avoiding it all together will undermine your professional credibility.
Film and video offer another avenue through which to pursue a self study program. Online media sources provide a growing number of sites with film footage, interviews with combatants, raw footage from combat zones, and more polished television shows. The last category includes a variety of programs that seek to inform and often provide information and perspectives on battles, leadership, and materiel.
These sources can provide a less intimidating yet immersive start point for a self study program. Many of the items listed can either be viewed online or purchased as individual episodes in most cases.
MCoE Homepage. Armor and Cavalry Heritage, Tactics, and Small Unit Actions "Armor operations are conducted by fire and maneuver and are combined and controlled to create a preponderance of combat power that culminates in a powerful and violent action at the decisive time and place. Saint, ] "Find the bastards—then pile on.
Reflections How do the collective characteristics of cavalry and armored units make them well-suited to operations across the range of military operations in diverse operational environments?
How would you characterize the core competencies of Armor organizations? What constitutes the greatest combat threat to cavalry and armored organizations today? How can this threat be mitigated with the current capabilities, skills, and assets available to the Armor leader? What additional skills, capabilities, and training would improve the ability of scouts to apply the fundamentals of reconnaissance and security in any operational environment? What training changes or additions would better instill in soldiers a deeper awareness of the capabilities and limitations of armored units in order to ensure the most effective tactical employment?
What can I do to improve my command of a cavalry or armored unit and the leadership of my subordinates? How do I enhance my understanding of the role of cavalry and armored organizations in a combined arms, joint, or coalition setting?
Farquhar ed. Tank-Fighter Team by Robert M. Tip of the Spear: U. Army Small-Unit Action in Iraq, McGrath ed. In Contact! Case Studies From the Long War. I by William G. Robertson ed. Yates eds. Wright ed.
0コメント